Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:45:04 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com,
        boqun.feng@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
        kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
Message-ID: <20170810114504.GD20323@X58A-UD3R>
References: <1502089981-21272-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
 <20170810111019.n376bsm6h4de2jvi@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170810111019.n376bsm6h4de2jvi@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 767
Lines: 21

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 01:10:19PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> wrote:
> 
> > Change from v7
> > 	- rebase on latest tip/sched/core (Jul 26 2017)
> > 	- apply peterz's suggestions
> > 	- simplify code of crossrelease_{hist/soft/hard}_{start/end}
> > 	- exclude a patch avoiding redundant links
> > 	- exclude a patch already applied onto the base
> 
> Ok, it's looking pretty good here now, there's one thing I'd like you to change, 
> please remove all the new Kconfig dependencies:
> 
>  CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE=y
>  CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETE=y
> 
> and make it all part of PROVE_LOCKING, like most of the other lock debugging bits.

OK. I will remove them. What about CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK? Should I also
remove it?