DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 72B56432AE
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@microsoft.com>,
        Simon Xiao <sixiao@microsoft.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] Hyper-V: paravirtualized remote TLB flushing and hypercall improvements
References: <20170802160921.21791-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:58:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20170802160921.21791-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> (Vitaly Kuznetsov's
        message of "Wed, 2 Aug 2017 18:09:12 +0200")
Message-ID: <87k22btz0v.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 951
Lines: 24

Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:

> Changes since v9:
> - Rebase to 4.13-rc3.
> - Drop PATCH1 as it was already taken by Greg to char-misc tree. There're no
>   functional dependencies on this patch so the series can go through a different tree
>   (and it actually belongs to x86 if I got Ingo's comment right).
> - Add in missing void return type in PATCH1 [Colin King, Ingo Molnar, Greg KH]
> - A few minor fixes in what is now PATCH7: add pr_fmt, tiny style fix in
>   hyperv_flush_tlb_others() [Andy Shevchenko]
> - Fix "error: implicit declaration of function 'virt_to_phys'" in PATCH2
>   reported by kbuild test robot (#include <asm/io.h>)
> - Add Steven's 'Reviewed-by:' to PATCH9.

Thomas, Ingo, Greg,

do I get it right that the intention is to take this series through x86
tree? (See: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2561174.html) If so,
is there anything else I need to do to get it accepted?

Thanks,

-- 
  Vitaly