Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264887AbTF0W51 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:57:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264900AbTF0W51 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:57:27 -0400 Received: from dialup-168.157.221.203.acc50-nort-cbr.comindico.com.au ([203.221.157.168]:10500 "EHLO chimp.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264887AbTF0W50 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:57:26 -0400 Message-ID: <3EFCCF23.4050009@cyberone.com.au> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 09:11:31 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030527 Debian/1.3.1-2 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Con Kolivas CC: linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] O1int patch with contest References: <200306280041.47619.kernel@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: <200306280041.47619.kernel@kolivas.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 836 Lines: 26 Con Kolivas wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >I've had some (off list) requests to see if the interactivity patch I posted >shows any differences in contest. To be honest I wasn't sure it would, and >this is not quite what I expected. Below is a 2.5.73-mm1 patched with >patch-O1int-0306271816 (2.5.73-O1i) compared to 2.5.73-mm1 with contest >(http://contest.kolivas.org). > > Hi Con, It looks like the patch is starving the background loads. read_load for example can use up to 7% (maybe more) of the CPU. It is brought down to 2.2%, list_load is worse. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/