Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752495AbdHJPRp (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:17:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46158 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751914AbdHJPRo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:17:44 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com E54BD7BE49 Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=vkuznets@redhat.com From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , "H. Peter Anvin" , Steven Rostedt , Jork Loeser , Simon Xiao , Andy Lutomirski , Andy Shevchenko , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] Hyper-V: paravirtualized remote TLB flushing and hypercall improvements References: <20170802160921.21791-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <87k22btz0v.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20170810151205.mtvhkrgyjnacsmef@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:17:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170810151205.mtvhkrgyjnacsmef@gmail.com> (Ingo Molnar's message of "Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:12:05 +0200") Message-ID: <87r2wjsb8s.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 15:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1384 Lines: 35 Ingo Molnar writes: > * Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Vitaly Kuznetsov writes: >> >> > Changes since v9: >> > - Rebase to 4.13-rc3. >> > - Drop PATCH1 as it was already taken by Greg to char-misc tree. There're no >> > functional dependencies on this patch so the series can go through a different tree >> > (and it actually belongs to x86 if I got Ingo's comment right). >> > - Add in missing void return type in PATCH1 [Colin King, Ingo Molnar, Greg KH] >> > - A few minor fixes in what is now PATCH7: add pr_fmt, tiny style fix in >> > hyperv_flush_tlb_others() [Andy Shevchenko] >> > - Fix "error: implicit declaration of function 'virt_to_phys'" in PATCH2 >> > reported by kbuild test robot (#include ) >> > - Add Steven's 'Reviewed-by:' to PATCH9. >> >> Thomas, Ingo, Greg, >> >> do I get it right that the intention is to take this series through x86 >> tree? (See: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2561174.html) If so, >> is there anything else I need to do to get it accepted? > > Yeah, the patches are arch/x86/-heavy, so that would be the ideal workflow - it's > just that the series coincided with x86 maintainers vacation time! > > I've picked them up now into tip:x86/platform (they look good to me) and will push > them out after some testing. > Great, thanks! -- Vitaly