Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 20:20:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 20:20:32 -0500 Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:3578 "EHLO imladris.rielhome.conectiva") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 20:20:21 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 21:29:05 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel To: "David S. Miller" cc: Ulrich Kunitz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tiny MM performance and typo patches for 2.4.2 In-Reply-To: <15010.47547.612134.819466@pizda.ninka.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > Ulrich Kunitz writes: > > patch-uk6 In 2.4.x _page_hashfn divides struct address_space pointer > > with a parameter derived from the size of struct > > inode. Deriving this parameter from the size of struct > > address_space makes more sense -- at least for me. > > The address_space is %99 of the time (unless swapping, and in that > case the address is constant :-)) inside of an inode struct so this > change actually makes the hash worse. I looked at this one time > myself... The other patches look fine to me. Alan, Linus, could you please include Ulrich's other patches in the next pre-kernel ? thanks, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/