Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752844AbdHKKqR (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 06:46:17 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:38305 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752616AbdHKKqQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 06:46:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:46:15 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dan Williams Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Ross Zwisler , "karam . lee" , seungho1.park@lge.com, Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Jan Kara , Jens Axboe , Vishal Verma , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , kernel-team Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] fs: use on-stack-bio if backing device has BDI_CAP_SYNC capability Message-ID: <20170811104615.GA14397@lst.de> References: <1502175024-28338-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> <1502175024-28338-3-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> <20170808124959.GB31390@bombadil.infradead.org> <20170808132904.GC31390@bombadil.infradead.org> <20170809015113.GB32338@bbox> <20170809023122.GF31390@bombadil.infradead.org> <20170809024150.GA32471@bbox> <20170810030433.GG31390@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 398 Lines: 9 On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 08:06:24PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > I like it, but do you think we should switch to sbvec[] to > preclude pathological cases where nr_pages is large? Yes, please. Then I'd like to see that the on-stack bio even matters for mpage_readpage / mpage_writepage. Compared to all the buffer head overhead the bio allocation should not actually matter in practice.