Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265253AbTF1O6D (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:58:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265256AbTF1O6D (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:58:03 -0400 Received: from mail47-s.fg.online.no ([148.122.161.47]:18384 "EHLO mail47.fg.online.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265253AbTF1O6B convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:58:01 -0400 From: Svein Ove Aas To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dell vs. GPL Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:12:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <1056780761.10255.10.camel@granite> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306281712.15947.svein.ove@aas.no> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 966 Lines: 30 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 l?rdag 28. juni 2003, 17:05, skrev Doug McNaught: > AIUI, they need to supply full source, not just a patch against code > you get from someone else. Now that's just silly. The kernel is *how* many megabytes? And it's very easily available. You may be right, but if you are it's for very legalistic reasons that don't matter in real life. Personally I'd rather download a small patch than a multi-megabyte kernel nearly identical to the one I have in /usr/src. - - Svein Ove Aas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+/bBN9OlFkai3rMARAno/AKCGYu9TuxujsubVZNiHuTxjeZChHACgoxpJ UCYcGhSL9MXTui3xTTfimP8= =58hh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/