Subject: Re: Dell vs. GPL
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com
To: Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>
Cc: Svein Ove Aas <svein.ove@aas.no>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <m3isqq1b91.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306280005000.29249-100000@gibson.mw.luc.edu>
	 <1056780761.10255.10.camel@granite> <m3n0g21bu0.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com>
	 <200306281712.15947.svein.ove@aas.no>
	 <m3isqq1b91.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-OugVLi4tixGwK8zC7RkF"
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
Message-Id: <1056815346.5724.2.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 28 Jun 2003 17:49:07 +0200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1141
Lines: 38


--=-OugVLi4tixGwK8zC7RkF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 17:18, Doug McNaught wrote:
> Svein Ove Aas <svein.ove@aas.no> writes:
>=20
> > l=C3=B8rdag 28. juni 2003, 17:05, skrev Doug McNaught:
> > > AIUI, they need to supply full source, not just a patch against code
> > > you get from someone else.
> >=20
> > Now that's just silly.
>=20
> But legally required by the GPL.

GPL requires the "prefered form" which one can argue is a patch in this
case ;)


--=-OugVLi4tixGwK8zC7RkF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+/bjyxULwo51rQBIRAuxHAJ9z92xrAr1H8GGZN96e0O5fxPCkpACfe/AD
mXR/5qtz1wGFeTXTo/PwVgI=
=hBph
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-OugVLi4tixGwK8zC7RkF--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/