Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753883AbdHKVbj (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:31:39 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:36198 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753811AbdHKVbh (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:31:37 -0400 Subject: Re: Aw: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: improve tpm_tis send() performance by ignoring burstcount Cc: linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20170807114632.1339-1-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170808191145.kggmoczd5laiccrn@linux.intel.com> From: Ken Goldman Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:32:12 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17081121-0012-0000-0000-000014D26956 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00007527; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000220; SDB=6.00900929; UDB=6.00451093; IPR=6.00681133; BA=6.00005523; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00016650; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2017-08-11 21:31:35 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17081121-0013-0000-0000-00004F03FD38 Message-Id: <9cb350b6-32fd-529e-eb31-6800339cddb2@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-08-11_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1706020000 definitions=main-1708110338 To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 776 Lines: 19 On 8/9/2017 5:00 PM, Peter Huewe wrote: > > Since we are the linux kernel, we do have to care for legacy > devices. And a system with LPC, PS2Mouse on SuperIO and a TPM are not > that uncommon. > > And heck, we even have support for 1.1b TPM devices.... Understood. However, remember that SuperIO is a 1980's device that predates the TPM. Since the TPM requires special LPC bus cycles, it's even less likely that an old chipset has an attached TPM. > Interesting - let me check with Georg tomorrow. Unfortunately I do > not have access to my tcg mails from home (since I'm not working :), > but did you _explicitly_ talk about LPC and the system? I'm sure the > TPM does not care about the waitstates... Yes, Infineon was one of the 3 TPM vendors who confirmed this.