Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752109AbdHLAbt (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 20:31:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:36267 "EHLO mail-wm0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752021AbdHLAbq (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 20:31:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: John Stultz Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:31:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 1 To: Wei Wang Cc: Cong Wang , Martin KaFai Lau , lkml , Network Development , Linux USB List , "David S. Miller" , Felipe Balbi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1369 Lines: 36 On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Wei Wang wrote: >> If after Cong's fix, the issue still happens, could you help try the >> patch attached and collect all logs when you try the reproduce the >> issue? It would be great to have logs for both success case and the >> failure case. >> >> Thanks so much for your help. >> > > I think we have a potential fix for this issue. > Martin and I found that when addrconf_dst_alloc() creates a rt6, it is > possible that rt6->dst.dev points to loopback device while > rt6->rt6i_idev->dev points to a real device. > When the real device goes down, the current fib6 clean up code only > checks for rt6->dst.dev and assumes rt6->rt6i_idev->dev is the same. > That leaves unreleased refcnt on the real device if rt6->dst.dev > points to loopback dev. > > The attached potential fix is tested by Martin and made sure it fixes his issue. > > John, > It will be great if you can also give it a try and see if it fixes the > issue on your side before I submit an official patch. So yes, sorry I haven't been able to get back quicker on the other patches sent, was mucking about in other work. So yea, this patch (potential fix for unregister_netdevice()) seems to avoid the issue. I'm going to do some further testing, but its looking good so far. Do you still want feedback on the previous changes? thanks -john