Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752151AbdHLDH5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 23:07:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f180.google.com ([209.85.128.180]:37777 "EHLO mail-wr0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752064AbdHLDHy (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 23:07:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: John Stultz Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 20:07:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 1 To: Wei Wang Cc: Cong Wang , Martin KaFai Lau , lkml , Network Development , Linux USB List , "David S. Miller" , Felipe Balbi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1587 Lines: 42 On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:31 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Wei Wang wrote: >>> If after Cong's fix, the issue still happens, could you help try the >>> patch attached and collect all logs when you try the reproduce the >>> issue? It would be great to have logs for both success case and the >>> failure case. >>> >>> Thanks so much for your help. >>> >> >> I think we have a potential fix for this issue. >> Martin and I found that when addrconf_dst_alloc() creates a rt6, it is >> possible that rt6->dst.dev points to loopback device while >> rt6->rt6i_idev->dev points to a real device. >> When the real device goes down, the current fib6 clean up code only >> checks for rt6->dst.dev and assumes rt6->rt6i_idev->dev is the same. >> That leaves unreleased refcnt on the real device if rt6->dst.dev >> points to loopback dev. >> >> The attached potential fix is tested by Martin and made sure it fixes his issue. >> >> John, >> It will be great if you can also give it a try and see if it fixes the >> issue on your side before I submit an official patch. > > So yes, sorry I haven't been able to get back quicker on the other > patches sent, was mucking about in other work. > > So yea, this patch (potential fix for unregister_netdevice()) seems > to avoid the issue. > > I'm going to do some further testing, but its looking good so far. Looks good so far! I've not hit the issue yet. Thanks so much for sorting out a fix! If its useful: Tested-by: John Stultz thanks again -john