Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 09:36:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 09:36:40 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:37640 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 09:36:32 -0500 Message-ID: <3A017BCF.DAAE9827@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 09:35:59 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: root@chaos.analogic.com CC: Thomas Sailer , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Poll and OSS API In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > The specification is bogus and should be fixed. select() is not > a function that was designed to start/stop anything. Writing > a specification to qualify some particular implementation's > side-affects is patently wrong. ioctl() was designed to control > things. > > You should contact a committee member and get it fixed. Further, > all should fail to write code to such a so-called specification. > > If specifications are allowed to be written like this, soon > the lights will go out when you open a file. This cannot be > allowed. Don't support such diatribe. We are stuck with the current OSS API, including warts aplenty, until ALSA replaces it. (but even then OSS will live on in infamy...) Jeff -- Jeff Garzik | Dinner is ready when Building 1024 | the smoke alarm goes off. MandrakeSoft | -/usr/games/fortune - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/