DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 3069B7F3F2
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 19:01:06 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>, davem@davemloft.net,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 3/3] tap: XDP support
Message-ID: <20170814185951-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <1502451678-17358-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
 <1502451678-17358-4-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
 <20170811161223.6808008d@cakuba.netronome.com>
 <8876b3d1-699c-d033-e855-34b24a709c81@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <8876b3d1-699c-d033-e855-34b24a709c81@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1566
Lines: 45

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 10:48:49AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2017年08月12日 07:12, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 19:41:18 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > This patch tries to implement XDP for tun. The implementation was
> > > split into two parts:
> > > 
> > > - fast path: small and no gso packet. We try to do XDP at page level
> > >    before build_skb(). For XDP_TX, since creating/destroying queues
> > >    were completely under control of userspace, it was implemented
> > >    through generic XDP helper after skb has been built. This could be
> > >    optimized in the future.
> > > - slow path: big or gso packet. We try to do it after skb was created
> > >    through generic XDP helpers.
> > > 
> > > Test were done through pktgen with small packets.
> > > 
> > > xdp1 test shows ~41.1% improvement:
> > > 
> > > Before: ~1.7Mpps
> > > After:  ~2.3Mpps
> > > 
> > > xdp_redirect to ixgbe shows ~60% improvement:
> > > 
> > > Before: ~0.8Mpps
> > > After:  ~1.38Mpps
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > Looks OK to me now :)
> > 
> > Out of curiosity, you say the build_skb() is for "small packets", and it
> > seems you are always reserving the 256B regardless of XDP being
> > installed.  Does this have no performance impact on non-XDP case?
> 
> Have a test, only less than 1% were noticed which I think could be ignored.
> 
> Thanks

What did you test btw? The biggest issue would be with something like
UDP with short packets.

-- 
MST