Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752501AbdHNTCg (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:02:36 -0400 Received: from g4t3426.houston.hpe.com ([15.241.140.75]:53706 "EHLO g4t3426.houston.hpe.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752195AbdHNTCa (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:02:30 -0400 From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" To: "bp@alien8.de" CC: "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] ghes_edac: avoid multiple calls to dmi_walk() Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 4/7] ghes_edac: avoid multiple calls to dmi_walk() Thread-Index: AQHTDKTuWyxK/OMe00e0Ovda8CeGBqJzlIKAgAEZcQCAAIyugIAD9yeAgAW2iQCABSfDgIAACkUAgAAEFwCAAAdxAIAACkmAgAAGWwCAAAC7gIAAB8WAgAAEpwA= Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 19:02:15 +0000 Message-ID: <1502736750.2042.145.camel@hpe.com> References: <20170805051615.GC23214@nazgul.tnic> <1502128177.2042.131.camel@hpe.com> <20170811090414.GB9432@nazgul.tnic> <1502725671.2042.137.camel@hpe.com> <20170814162436.lta5xm742hh6g7yk@pd.tnic> <1502728754.2042.139.camel@hpe.com> <20170814170552.j3lhzvnwlpz75y4g@pd.tnic> <1502732561.2042.141.camel@hpe.com> <20170814180526.wtfjzgc6uye2qtx6@pd.tnic> <1502734083.2042.143.camel@hpe.com> <20170814183551.sgk2i7lxpmpyodhv@pd.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20170814183551.sgk2i7lxpmpyodhv@pd.tnic> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=toshi.kani@hpe.com; x-originating-ip: [15.211.195.8] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;DF4PR84MB0187;6:iaAOq+7DkSZN8Ay32HKSpHPTsj52X+8iI+WnbJkmWTe03SfULQKcyhJFQNLbGMocprpU9WL1oWard6RE3RF/anWbLTE8nwC2YSt+1BPPPX31cPHguTPlRz7xJq4qamPsnYKt6mDxgvoI5P31r5mBVFbHjKOEV8efr1WXxlxMJZh6AWRXaeVXEF15M5q65daPbJ1LdF3mwtsSTCNTuoUtkADasYtt3/Jf3PulBFEdvca9cueXXlIkfySZdsm3orckBwXVGBQWAodAZvNj49n0rz6THNLJOQ2v2jfa82f2l8pwS1Da6Fo0vWRy9OeaDJ7/QZmBNqVC7A930LwifReUkA==;5:RZdIvzx69KG5vxFqU/Tg1HJuSD7ZPXroT5J9PjJbWEJS5DUPO5R8qy0vm2bVeahEOrdMzj5AsHP2zZ3sJNa9fx7hGepIgewxr1w3Wi7nd4WBksleQEtJox2aqHwI7aR+sq37OdC6CUDARWJv36HkpA==;24:htJmS55wsFZUScAZKBECLffN36LQZIisK+u92QtzbWDkH9K5QAJp557nNt7roElGPoR7bXSxt+xNJ9KMKX0s2nNrc1ewiU2ILtu9H0xkGrw=;7:4eUeHkGSpRjrZXyQd0AxYehmSIXYZHEqJQ7piVOt9i4IOn/JhnybIkU50vljyqw/KY909d2JCHD4M1KOIbjJxzDwygen1yk6O7SMPoeRGKZHyIYLWprc2zzEERB5MNfjtAiQrLl3Y60VQ+es2Uww5sT+fUtBJj8LiE1wmZW1NcONFJ7K6jf+CBYcHKsiDPXjTRn2XQJk52JGhYrXLNmX4spptggPGPdPrh7oU+xMhF8= x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a158b3ec-9e9e-428b-9c3d-08d4e346fab0 x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254152)(48565401081)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603031)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095);SRVR:DF4PR84MB0187; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DF4PR84MB0187: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(100000703101)(100105400095)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123555025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095);SRVR:DF4PR84MB0187;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095);SRVR:DF4PR84MB0187; x-forefront-prvs: 039975700A x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39860400002)(377424004)(199003)(24454002)(189002)(53936002)(103116003)(6512007)(66066001)(5640700003)(3280700002)(68736007)(305945005)(25786009)(478600001)(4326008)(6916009)(2950100002)(86362001)(7736002)(2900100001)(14454004)(2501003)(54356999)(50986999)(76176999)(229853002)(105586002)(189998001)(5660300001)(6506006)(101416001)(54906002)(110136004)(6246003)(93886004)(2906002)(36756003)(2351001)(3846002)(6116002)(6486002)(77096006)(106356001)(8936002)(97736004)(8676002)(102836003)(6436002)(3660700001)(81156014)(1730700003)(33646002)(81166006);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:DF4PR84MB0187;H:DF4PR84MB0187.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM;FPR:;SPF:None;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <2E812CD45140D241A4BA6F6E2512E731@NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Aug 2017 19:02:15.8082 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 105b2061-b669-4b31-92ac-24d304d195dc X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DF4PR84MB0187 X-OriginatorOrg: hpe.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by nfs id v7EJ2eqH027951 Content-Length: 934 Lines: 25 On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 20:35 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 06:17:47PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > > Right, ghes_edac_report_mem_error() gets serialized per a GHES > > entry, but not globally. > > Globally what? GHES v2's ACKĀ is not a global lock. So, it does not guarantee that ghes_edac_report_mem_error() never gets called concurrently. > What is the actual potential scenario for concurrency issues you see? > Example pls. ghes_probe() supports multiple sources defined in acpi_hest_notify_types. Say, there are two entries for memory errors, one with ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL and the other with ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI. They may report errors independently. While ghes_edac_report_mem_error() is being called from the SCI, it can be called from the ext interrupt at a same time. I do not know how likely we see such case, but the code should be written according to the spec. Thanks, -Toshi