Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753141AbdHOP6f convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:58:35 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:53520 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751810AbdHOP6e (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:58:34 -0400 Message-ID: <1502812653.1349.94.camel@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz From: Mike Galbraith To: Christopher Lameter , "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Luiz Capitulino , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Chris Metcalf , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Rik van Riel , Wanpeng Li Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:57:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1500643290-25842-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1500643290-25842-8-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20170811123927.33e094f3@redhat.com> <20170812141004.GA21918@lerouge> <20170813111340.0ade6d58@redhat.com> <20170814170107.GA27479@lerouge> <20170814133440.3dc31bad@redhat.com> <1502735386.31351.61.camel@gmx.de> <20170815130712.GA16627@lerouge> <1502810123.1349.71.camel@gmx.de> <20170815153005.GJ7017@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:DF/g6ezGTNWzoISJA/5rbMwnynGIDWMFuGRjQWGpuEnqBNMG0aS aUG4JrImGvG0IdhZuTc4TeRXsArun/D8otjjXNoLvbfm9dONodLDWah8EpgggRpNc05UUKg 6//b1B84iDFGkPlNWXJc6daT+O0GHBMdNpgkkGUpcuvwAu/yTK7ae8em8ns1bywDvs0fvP3 PM0uBFA/mQOkdrCBJ+QKg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:QpU5KtkGttI=:IW438TBje9Vc1k6bo24Rm4 t9xxajuexDuzZTOCTweV6FHg4sRIJu6AyUkrcchIMiXLmw+xTCbIv7jKTrkzHcC3Y4dk2sIp/ Y8OSH2QVfuW2xF1gpkt69GnDAu7WiMHxIkbs/ukIIZ6Ml0kf18/Wd0SlKVO8weGGhmcAJIQ13 eVO6R0RypOvQz2TERAyrrD9xkVdS1Eu47LcP4IFUU6VINp5n9CpdxuoDQZmPchTVQRwurID6k jImKHsNF1m3EifIossnZIYyqdrgKSDMDcQqM7ezNckqqylDNy73AFvhRfoyOdm5uYhOx0eKJe SPsxt9Y73yuX/pbrz63JNFDvgW3v+dHSGalqliH1Urz5vPSSoUPuQY0gqvzSSBD9yoGRKfK3c cjyqvhzvusHBxgW6zDbhR7UqkzbfYbukYOYcvROHHB5rwCIKfot9gU4kLrV2gopYjcDoNfvCB GFwwevFbFEd0IT12FmztktuXesI+5eD5srHYqEDR8Tr4QLkZcT1xipNcR1FFz3Ra+4J2JUIP5 NRfHx3xeIcgRB4oH0TaHmNPaQfesKFLYff+YncpS7KIVMyJjK9kMtRbEzh5UZe5QefUaW265j 6BMQl7WLfHisS4+WnloEpSfuJgEMGWXLF+M3iMXaZ5mstn0XtXSpSfJMvHYd+eubhWGCI94cX h5Z4vzHii7K6EH6temZSMnRr7gwH9kPPCGzHSW+CN8OQ7DPTzScWZk81MBa9jo+5YSLXv4+Gm A1NJE7AazYZsATOsH8D2sMw+zxui2hKfyLIlKU1Jve/frNR+NMOlujZT+n70L31FGy7n/tuo4 rZWgUY5sCq2v0O5Uqbxfmy0b69ssvvpT6oK8eJNGEii/J3zfPc= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 434 Lines: 12 On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 10:52 -0500, Christopher Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Don't the HPC guys just disable idle_balance(), or am I out of date again? > > Ummm.. Why does idle management matter when your goal is to keep all > processor busy working at maximum throughput? If you _never_ idle, you never have to worry about it.  Is 100% CPU until the end of time all there is to HPC? -Mike