Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753169AbdHOQAb (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:00:31 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39278 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751539AbdHOQA3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:00:29 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 59B5122BC6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:00:25 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Alex Shi Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , "open list:LOCKING PRIMITIVES" , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Sebastian Siewior , Mathieu Poirier , Juri Lelli , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 resend 1/2] rtmutex: update rt-mutex-design Message-ID: <20170815120025.4a67e683@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <1501465854-20983-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linaro.org> <20170807143039.700bc3e6@lwn.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 993 Lines: 32 On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:47:14 +0800 Alex Shi wrote: > On 08/08/2017 04:30 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:53:01 +0800 > > Alex Shi wrote: > > > >> On 07/31/2017 09:50 AM, Alex Shi wrote: > >>> -Reviewers: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Thomas Duetsch, and Randy Dunlap > >>> +Original Reviewers: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Thomas Duetsch, and > >>> + Randy Dunlap > >>> +Update (7/6/2017) Reviewers: Steven Rostedt and Sebastian Siewior > >>> > >> > >> Hi Peter&Ingo, > >> > >> This patch had been reviewed and acked by Sebastian and Steven. Do you > >> still need a official 'reviewed-by' from them? > > > > Given this, I've been assuming that these changes aren't meant to go > > through the docs tree; let me know if I should pick them up instead. > > > > Hi Jon, > > Sorry for skip you here. Yes, if you like to pick them, please go ahead! > > Agreed, Jon's tree is the best path. -- Steve