Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753559AbdHORoS (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:44:18 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:55600 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752661AbdHORoR (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:44:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:44:12 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Mark Rutland Cc: Laura Abbott , keescook@chromium.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net, james.morse@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/14] arm64: VMAP_STACK support Message-ID: <20170815174411.dyo6b2ktmu3wjegj@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1502801449-29246-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20170815173913.GA27057@leverpostej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170815173913.GA27057@leverpostej> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1034 Lines: 28 On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 06:39:14PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:18:20AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > > On 08/15/2017 05:50 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Ard and I have worked together to implement vmap stack support for > > > arm64. This supersedes our earlier vmap stack RFCs [0,1]. The git author > > > stats are a little misleading, as I've teased parts out into smaller > > > patches for review. > > > > > > The series is based on our stack dump rework [2,3], which can be found > > > in the arm64/exception-stack branch [4] of my kernel.org repo. This > > > series can be found in the arm64/vmap-stack branch [5] of the same repo. > > > Tested-by: Laura Abbott > > Thanks! > > > (I think I may be slightly late with this. Oh well.) > > On the chance that Catalin's happy to redo the pull, I've folded that > Tested-by in, and pushed the series. Pulled again as I haven't pushed it out yet (not until tomorrow, I'm running some tests overnight). -- Catalin