Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752814AbdHOTes (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:34:48 -0400 Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com ([67.231.154.164]:58674 "EHLO dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751119AbdHOTeq (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:34:46 -0400 From: Edward Cree Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next] bpf/verifier: track liveness for pruning To: , Alexei Starovoitov , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann CC: , , iovisor-dev Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 20:34:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.17.20.45] X-ClientProxiedBy: ocex03.SolarFlarecom.com (10.20.40.36) To ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-11.0.0.1191-8.100.1062-23258.003 X-TM-AS-Result: No--18.294300-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-MDID: 1502825686-RmIyWkB52Unr Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 17648 Lines: 544 State of a register doesn't matter if it wasn't read in reaching an exit; a write screens off all reads downstream of it from all explored_states upstream of it. This allows us to prune many more branches; here are some processed insn counts for some Cilium programs: Program before after bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L3.o 6515 3361 bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L4.o 8976 5176 bpf_lb_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 2960 1137 bpf_lxc_opt_-DDROP_ALL.o 95412 48537 bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 141706 78718 bpf_netdev.o 24251 17995 bpf_overlay.o 10999 9385 The runtime is also improved; here are 'time' results in ms: Program before after bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L3.o 24 6 bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L4.o 26 11 bpf_lb_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 11 2 bpf_lxc_opt_-DDROP_ALL.o 1288 139 bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 1768 234 bpf_netdev.o 62 31 bpf_overlay.o 15 13 Signed-off-by: Edward Cree --- v3: cleaner code around marking caller-saved regs, again spotted by Daniel Borkmann. Should have no functional effect. v2: update liveness in LD_ABS|IND, as pointed out by Daniel Borkmann. The numbers are mostly unchanged; bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o dropped about 300 insns and 20ms, while bpf_lxc_opt_-DDROP_ALL.o (despite not changing its #insns) also dropped 13ms. include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 11 ++- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 189 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index c61c3033..91d07ef 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ */ #define BPF_MAX_VAR_SIZ INT_MAX +enum bpf_reg_liveness { + REG_LIVE_NONE = 0, /* reg hasn't been read or written this branch */ + REG_LIVE_READ, /* reg was read, so we're sensitive to initial value */ + REG_LIVE_WRITTEN, /* reg was written first, screening off later reads */ +}; + struct bpf_reg_state { enum bpf_reg_type type; union { @@ -40,7 +46,7 @@ struct bpf_reg_state { * came from, when one is tested for != NULL. */ u32 id; - /* These five fields must be last. See states_equal() */ + /* Ordering of fields matters. See states_equal() */ /* For scalar types (SCALAR_VALUE), this represents our knowledge of * the actual value. * For pointer types, this represents the variable part of the offset @@ -57,6 +63,8 @@ struct bpf_reg_state { s64 smax_value; /* maximum possible (s64)value */ u64 umin_value; /* minimum possible (u64)value */ u64 umax_value; /* maximum possible (u64)value */ + /* This field must be last, for states_equal() reasons. */ + enum bpf_reg_liveness live; }; enum bpf_stack_slot_type { @@ -74,6 +82,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state { struct bpf_reg_state regs[MAX_BPF_REG]; u8 stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK]; struct bpf_reg_state spilled_regs[MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE]; + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent; }; /* linked list of verifier states used to prune search */ diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index ecc590e..7dd96d0 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -629,8 +629,10 @@ static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_reg_state *regs) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) + for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) { mark_reg_not_init(regs, i); + regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; + } /* frame pointer */ regs[BPF_REG_FP].type = PTR_TO_STACK; @@ -647,9 +649,26 @@ enum reg_arg_type { DST_OP_NO_MARK /* same as above, check only, don't mark */ }; -static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, +static void mark_reg_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, u32 regno) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent = state->parent; + + while (parent) { + /* if read wasn't screened by an earlier write ... */ + if (state->regs[regno].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) + break; + /* ... then we depend on parent's value */ + parent->regs[regno].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + state = parent; + parent = state->parent; + } +} + +static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, enum reg_arg_type t) { + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + if (regno >= MAX_BPF_REG) { verbose("R%d is invalid\n", regno); return -EINVAL; @@ -661,12 +680,14 @@ static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, verbose("R%d !read_ok\n", regno); return -EACCES; } + mark_reg_read(&env->cur_state, regno); } else { /* check whether register used as dest operand can be written to */ if (regno == BPF_REG_FP) { verbose("frame pointer is read only\n"); return -EACCES; } + regs[regno].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; if (t == DST_OP) mark_reg_unknown(regs, regno); } @@ -695,7 +716,7 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type) static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, int value_regno) { - int i; + int i, spi = (MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE; /* caller checked that off % size == 0 and -MAX_BPF_STACK <= off < 0, * so it's aligned access and [off, off + size) are within stack limits */ @@ -710,15 +731,14 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, } /* save register state */ - state->spilled_regs[(MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE] = - state->regs[value_regno]; + state->spilled_regs[spi] = state->regs[value_regno]; + state->spilled_regs[spi].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] = STACK_SPILL; } else { /* regular write of data into stack */ - state->spilled_regs[(MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE] = - (struct bpf_reg_state) {}; + state->spilled_regs[spi] = (struct bpf_reg_state) {}; for (i = 0; i < size; i++) state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] = STACK_MISC; @@ -726,11 +746,26 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, return 0; } +static void mark_stack_slot_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int slot) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent = state->parent; + + while (parent) { + /* if read wasn't screened by an earlier write ... */ + if (state->spilled_regs[slot].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) + break; + /* ... then we depend on parent's value */ + parent->spilled_regs[slot].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + state = parent; + parent = state->parent; + } +} + static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, int value_regno) { u8 *slot_type; - int i; + int i, spi; slot_type = &state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off]; @@ -746,10 +781,13 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, } } - if (value_regno >= 0) + spi = (MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE; + + if (value_regno >= 0) { /* restore register state from stack */ - state->regs[value_regno] = - state->spilled_regs[(MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE]; + state->regs[value_regno] = state->spilled_regs[spi]; + mark_stack_slot_read(state, spi); + } return 0; } else { for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { @@ -1167,7 +1205,6 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; int err; if ((BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_W && BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_DW) || @@ -1177,12 +1214,12 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_ins } /* check src1 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; /* check src2 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -1297,10 +1334,9 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, if (arg_type == ARG_DONTCARE) return 0; - if (type == NOT_INIT) { - verbose("R%d !read_ok\n", regno); - return -EACCES; - } + err = check_reg_arg(env, regno, SRC_OP); + if (err) + return err; if (arg_type == ARG_ANYTHING) { if (is_pointer_value(env, regno)) { @@ -1639,10 +1675,12 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) } /* reset caller saved regs */ - for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) + for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]); + check_reg_arg(env, caller_saved[i], DST_OP_NO_MARK); + } - /* update return register */ + /* update return register (already marked as written above) */ if (fn->ret_type == RET_INTEGER) { /* sets type to SCALAR_VALUE */ mark_reg_unknown(regs, BPF_REG_0); @@ -2250,7 +2288,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } /* check src operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -2261,7 +2299,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } /* check dest operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -2274,7 +2312,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } /* check src operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; } else { @@ -2285,7 +2323,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } /* check dest operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -2328,7 +2366,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) return -EINVAL; } /* check src1 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; } else { @@ -2339,7 +2377,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } /* check src2 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -2360,7 +2398,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } /* check dest operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK); if (err) return err; @@ -2717,7 +2755,7 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } /* check src1 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -2734,7 +2772,7 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } /* check src2 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -2851,7 +2889,7 @@ static int check_ld_imm(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) return -EINVAL; } - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -2917,7 +2955,7 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } /* check whether implicit source operand (register R6) is readable */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, BPF_REG_6, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, BPF_REG_6, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -2928,17 +2966,20 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) if (mode == BPF_IND) { /* check explicit source operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; } /* reset caller saved regs to unreadable */ - for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) + for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]); + check_reg_arg(env, caller_saved[i], DST_OP_NO_MARK); + } /* mark destination R0 register as readable, since it contains - * the value fetched from the packet + * the value fetched from the packet. + * Already marked as written above. */ mark_reg_unknown(regs, BPF_REG_0); return 0; @@ -3194,7 +3235,11 @@ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct bpf_reg_state *rcur, bool varlen_map_access, struct idpair *idmap) { - if (memcmp(rold, rcur, sizeof(*rold)) == 0) + if (!(rold->live & REG_LIVE_READ)) + /* explored state didn't use this */ + return true; + + if (memcmp(rold, rcur, offsetof(struct bpf_reg_state, live)) == 0) return true; if (rold->type == NOT_INIT) @@ -3372,10 +3417,56 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return ret; } +static bool do_propagate_liveness(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent) +{ + bool touched = false; /* any changes made? */ + int i; + + if (!parent) + return touched; + /* Propagate read liveness of registers... */ + BUILD_BUG_ON(BPF_REG_FP + 1 != MAX_BPF_REG); + /* We don't need to worry about FP liveness because it's read-only */ + for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) { + if (parent->regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) + continue; + if (state->regs[i].live == REG_LIVE_READ) { + parent->regs[i].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + touched = true; + } + } + /* ... and stack slots */ + for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (parent->stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_SPILL) + continue; + if (state->stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_SPILL) + continue; + if (parent->spilled_regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) + continue; + if (state->spilled_regs[i].live == REG_LIVE_READ) { + parent->regs[i].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + touched = true; + } + } + return touched; +} + +static void propagate_liveness(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, + struct bpf_verifier_state *parent) +{ + while (do_propagate_liveness(state, parent)) { + /* Something changed, so we need to feed those changes onward */ + state = parent; + parent = state->parent; + } +} + static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) { struct bpf_verifier_state_list *new_sl; struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl; + int i; sl = env->explored_states[insn_idx]; if (!sl) @@ -3385,11 +3476,14 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) return 0; while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) { - if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, &env->cur_state)) + if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, &env->cur_state)) { /* reached equivalent register/stack state, - * prune the search + * prune the search. + * Registers read by the continuation are read by us. */ + propagate_liveness(&sl->state, &env->cur_state); return 1; + } sl = sl->next; } @@ -3407,6 +3501,14 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) memcpy(&new_sl->state, &env->cur_state, sizeof(env->cur_state)); new_sl->next = env->explored_states[insn_idx]; env->explored_states[insn_idx] = new_sl; + /* connect new state to parentage chain */ + env->cur_state.parent = &new_sl->state; + /* clear liveness marks in current state */ + for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) + env->cur_state.regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; + for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) + if (env->cur_state.stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] == STACK_SPILL) + env->cur_state.spilled_regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; return 0; } @@ -3430,6 +3532,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) bool do_print_state = false; init_reg_state(regs); + state->parent = NULL; insn_idx = 0; env->varlen_map_value_access = false; for (;;) { @@ -3500,11 +3603,11 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) /* check for reserved fields is already done */ /* check src operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK); if (err) return err; @@ -3554,11 +3657,11 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } /* check src1 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; /* check src2 operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -3589,7 +3692,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return -EINVAL; } /* check src operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) return err; @@ -3643,7 +3746,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) * of bpf_exit, which means that program wrote * something into it earlier */ - err = check_reg_arg(regs, BPF_REG_0, SRC_OP); + err = check_reg_arg(env, BPF_REG_0, SRC_OP); if (err) return err;