Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752835AbdHOUhW (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:37:22 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36942 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752765AbdHOUhV (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:37:21 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8A00322C8D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=robh+dt@kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170811154236.12891-1-stephen.boyd@linaro.org> References: <20170811154236.12891-1-stephen.boyd@linaro.org> From: Rob Herring Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:36:59 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] OF phandle nexus support + GPIO nexus To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Frank Rowand , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King - ARM Linux , "devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1224 Lines: 24 On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > This is a continutation of my phandle remapping/nexus node series > from a while ago. I finally got around to writing the documentation > in the spec for this, but it's really rough around the edges and > could use some review/suggestions to get it into shape. Please > review! > > This is one small chunk of work related to DT overlays for expansion > boards. It would be good to have a way to expose #-cells types of > providers through a connector in a standard way. So we introduce a way > to make "nexus" nodes for these types of properties to remap the consumer > number space to the other side of the connector's number space. It's > basically a copy of the interrupt nexus implementation, but without > the address space matching design and interrupt-parent walking. This generally looks good to me. I'm inclined to merge the kernel parts now and sort the spec addition out afterwards. With no users yet, we can still tweak things if needed. I would like to see more comments on this though. Perhaps "OF phandle nexus" is too obscure. Maybe "Add DT overlay connector bindings" would trick some people in looking at it... Rob