Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753095AbdHOX06 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:26:58 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:56676 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752944AbdHOX0z (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:26:55 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 3AC5E60346 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=tbaicar@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: apei: fix the wrongly iterate generic error status block To: gengdongjiu Cc: Borislav Petkov , rjw@rjwysocki.net, Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, John Garry , Shiju Jose , zhengqiang10@huawei.com, Xiongfeng Wang , Huangshaoyu , wuquanming , James Morse , Geliang Tang , andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, austinwc@codeaurora.org, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, huangdaode@hisilicon.com, wangzhou1@hisilicon.com References: <1502795713-20945-1-git-send-email-gengdongjiu@huawei.com> <20170815161342.jxxf4rndqbs7t5rr@pd.tnic> <20170815163239.xm5y6w5yeiaakekv@pd.tnic> <20170815165551.4cwa344wm6eptj3d@pd.tnic> <7921a233-6971-6e3b-9164-01d6176d61c0@codeaurora.org> From: "Baicar, Tyler" Message-ID: <3747a14c-0801-fe10-f36e-af6458fd7bdf@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:26:50 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 843 Lines: 22 On 8/15/2017 3:34 PM, gengdongjiu wrote: > Hi Tyler , > >> Hello Boris, >> >> His patch fixes the define for apei_estatus_for_each_section which in turn >> should fix ghes_do_proc(). So my patch should no longer be needed. I'm going >> to test this out just to verify if fixes the issue I found. > I have verified the issue about the iteration for the revision 0x300 > generic error data, > it works well. it is good that you will verify that in your platform. I've verified that this resolves the issue as well! I'll re-test with the next version that adds this usage to cper_estatus_check() and add my tested-by after that. Thanks, Tyler -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.