Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752115AbdHPMiN (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:38:13 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:15104 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751893AbdHPMiM (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:38:12 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,382,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="890544917" Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:31:34 +0300 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Badhri Jagan Sridharan Cc: Guenter Roeck , USB , LKML Subject: Re: Sometimes supports_usb_power_delivery reports incorrect value. Message-ID: <20170816123134.GA12446@kuha.fi.intel.com> References: <20170815133626.GA30718@kuha.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 354 Lines: 11 On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:26:07PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > Submitted couple of patches for the missing pieces in TCPM. > Those patches along with "usb: typec: update partner power delivery > support with opmode" > seems to address the issue of reporting the right value for > supports_usb_power_delivery. Cool! Thanks Badhri! -- heikki