Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265769AbTF3GpQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 02:45:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265781AbTF3GpQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 02:45:16 -0400 Received: from client73.fre.communitycolo.net ([216.218.240.222]:22742 "EHLO slick.sigje.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265769AbTF3GpL (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 02:45:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:59:28 -0700 (PDT) From: ahorn@deorth.org X-X-Sender: ahorn@slick.sigje.org To: Andre Hedrick cc: David Schwartz , Fluke , linux-poweredge@dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: Dell vs. GPL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 885 Lines: 30 On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Andre Hedrick wrote: > >BAWHAHAHAHA > >Only if you assign copyright to FSF and they control you works, correction >"their works" now. > >Been there, got burned and no tshirt. > > >Andre Hedrick >LAD Storage Consulting Group > > Well, I couldn't possibly comment on that, but my original point stands; that pursuit of GPL violation must be pursued by the copyright _holder_, unless they assign that copyright to subsequent third-party beneficiaries. which technically I don't think they do, they merely grant a right to make copies in perpetuity, subject to the conditions of the GPL (or something like that) right ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/