DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com C9EA1C014162
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Allow v2 behavior in v1 cgroup
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
References: <1502818040-9967-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
 <20170816142926.GC4087514@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
 <f4900f62-9428-9b15-113a-c8883d321358@redhat.com>
 <20170816143625.GD4087514@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
Message-ID: <94646d69-190e-e9f4-4566-acbbe2e56496@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:39:22 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170816143625.GD4087514@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 657
Lines: 20

On 08/16/2017 10:36 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:34:05AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> It feels weird to make this a kernel boot param when all other options
>>> are specified on mount time.  Is there a reason why this can't be a
>>> mount option too?
>>>
>> Yes, we can certainly make this a mount option instead of a boot time
>> parameter. BTW, where do we usually document the mount options for cgroup?
> I don't think there's a central place.  Each controller documents
> theirs in their own file.
>
> Thanks.
>
OK, I am going to update the patch by controlling cpuset behavior by
mount option instead.

Thanks,
Longman