Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265375AbTF3IBr (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 04:01:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265633AbTF3IBr (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 04:01:47 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:55483 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265375AbTF3IBq (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 04:01:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:16:06 +0100 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: "Frederick, Fabian" Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Trying to improve /proc/filesystems Message-ID: <20030630081606.GN27348@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 548 Lines: 13 On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:55:45AM +0200, Frederick, Fabian wrote: > Alexander, > > Why don't we have centralized /proc/filesystems access ? 2 fields > file for fs can't be a standard "Centralized"? In which sense? Any shell script might be using that animal and expect the format to remain stable. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/