Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265834AbTF3J7d (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:59:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265838AbTF3J7d (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:59:33 -0400 Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:26343 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265834AbTF3J6r (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:58:47 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: patch-O1int-0306281420 for 2.5.73 interactivity Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 20:16:21 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Alfaro Solana , Zwane Mwaikambo References: <200306291457.40524.kernel@kolivas.org> <5.2.0.9.2.20030630094946.00cfb000@pop.gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030630094946.00cfb000@pop.gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306302016.21123.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1610 Lines: 41 On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:57, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Greetings, > > At 03:35 PM 6/30/2003 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > >Summary: > >A patch to reduce audio skipping and X jerking under load. > > I took it out for a quick spin. It kills thud graveyard dead. That's the > good news, now for the bad ;-) With a make -j5 running, kasteroids > stutters enough to be pretty annoying. The patched kernel is making > booboos wrt cc1's priority often enough to nail kasteroids pretty > hard. The mouse pointer also jerks around quite a bit,... Consider it not optimised yet. The workings are still evolving but are now close. It errs on the too-easy to get a bonus in the early ms after an app has started at the moment. > > >It's looking seriously like I'm talking to myelf here, but just in case > > there are lurkers testing this patch, there's a big bug that made it > > think jiffy wraparound was occurring so interactive tasks weren't > > receiving the boost they deserved. Here is a patch with the fix in. > > > >How to use if you're still thinking of testing: > >Use with Hz 1000, and use the granularity patch I posted as well for > >smoothing > >X off. > > ...but I'm not using that, because I wanted to see the pure effects of this > patch. Good point. If it's going to be developed properly it should only include what is likely to be used with it. Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/