Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265257AbTF3QPc (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:15:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265367AbTF3QPc (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:15:32 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:30444 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265257AbTF3QPb (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:15:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:29:51 +0100 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: Hans Reiser Cc: John Bradford , jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mlmoser@comcast.net Subject: Re: File System conversion -- ideas Message-ID: <20030630162951.GO27348@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200306300855.h5U8tNG2000475@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <3F0004A9.8080402@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F0004A9.8080402@namesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1381 Lines: 24 On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 01:36:41PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote: > I tend to agree with the below. I just want to add though that there > are a lot of users who have one disk drive and and no decent network > connection to somewhere with a lot of storage. It would be nice to > adapt tar to understand about the reiser4 resizer and mkreiser4 and the > reiser3 resizer, and the partitioner (yah, at this point it would no > longer really be tar, but.... ), and to have it shrink the V3 partition, > create a reiser4 partition, copy some of the V3 partition to the V4 > partition, shrink the V3 partition some more, etc..... > > Money will get us to do this. Otherwise we will work on what we are > contracted to do for DARPA. *Ugh*. If one really wants reiserfs v3 -> v4 conversion, presumably there are much more intelligent ways to do that. For one thing, you really don't want to create an empty tree and move the stuff from original node-by-node - that would give a shitload of IO on tree rebalancing alone, not to mention the PITA it will be for allocator (you get to reshuffle trees a lot on potentially almost full fs). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/