Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753830AbdHQSJu (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:09:50 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]:38884 "EHLO mail-lf0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753682AbdHQSJr (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:09:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] can: dev: Add support for limiting configured bitrate To: Franklin S Cooper Jr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com, dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be, andrew@lunn.ch, socketcan@hartkopp.net References: <20170810005916.27163-1-fcooper@ti.com> <20170810005916.27163-2-fcooper@ti.com> <9a6f4fdf-a4f6-283b-0e5a-693cc7d263ef@cogentembedded.com> From: Sergei Shtylyov Organization: Cogent Embedded Message-ID: Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:09:43 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-MW Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2386 Lines: 74 Hello! On 08/17/2017 08:54 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote: >>> Various CAN or CAN-FD IP may be able to run at a faster rate than >>> what the transceiver the CAN node is connected to. This can lead to >>> unexpected errors. However, CAN transceivers typically have fixed >>> limitations and provide no means to discover these limitations at >>> runtime. Therefore, add support for a can-transceiver node that >>> can be reused by other CAN peripheral drivers to determine for both >>> CAN and CAN-FD what the max bitrate that can be used. If the user >>> tries to configure CAN to pass these maximum bitrates it will throw >>> an error. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr >>> --- >>> Version 4 changes: >>> Used can-transceiver instead of fixed-transceiver. >>> >>> drivers/net/can/dev.c | 50 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> include/linux/can/dev.h | 5 +++++ >>> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/dev.c b/drivers/net/can/dev.c >>> index 365a8cc..372108f 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/can/dev.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/dev.c >> [...] >>> @@ -814,6 +815,39 @@ int open_candev(struct net_device *dev) >>> } >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(open_candev); >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF >>> +/* >>> + * Common function that can be used to understand the limitation of >>> + * a transceiver when it provides no means to determine these >>> limitations >>> + * at runtime. >>> + */ >>> +void of_can_transceiver(struct net_device *dev) >>> +{ >>> + struct device_node *dn; >>> + struct can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); >>> + struct device_node *np; >>> + unsigned int max_bitrate; >>> + int ret; >>> + >>> + np = dev->dev.parent->of_node; >> >> I'd do that as an initializer. > > Ok >> >>> + >>> + dn = of_get_child_by_name(np, "can-transceiver"); >>> + if (!dn) >>> + return; >>> + >>> + max_bitrate = 0; >>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dn, "max-bitrate", &max_bitrate); >> >> I'd initialize max_bitrate to 0 as iff of_property_read_u32() fails, >> it'll leave the variable unset...> >>> + >>> + if (max_bitrate > 0) { >> >> You risk checking unset variable here. > > Four lines up I am already setting max_bitrate to a default value of 0. Oops, sorry. Don't know how I missed that. Better done as initializer too though... MBR, Sergei