Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265874AbTF3U3m (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:29:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265875AbTF3U3m (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:29:42 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:28366 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265874AbTF3U3l (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:29:41 -0400 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dell vs. GPL In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.17-20030301 ("Bubbles") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.20-xfs (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:44:00 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 914 Lines: 22 In article you wrote: > Maybe you are different, and do not fit under the brush. However your > comments about NDA's leaves me little faith in your knowledge base. most likely you never needed to violate a NDA in favor of the legal truth, but be assured: nobody can force you to obey a contract which will make you lie or keep illegal methods secret. Actually most often, you can be held liable for knowning about it. And this is totally unrlated to NDAs in academics vs. NDAs in commercial business. Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/