Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751856AbdHRIcr (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:32:47 -0400 Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.99.137]:53494 "EHLO regular1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750960AbdHRIcp (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:32:45 -0400 X-263anti-spam: KSV:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 0 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 4 X-RL-SENDER: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com X-SENDER-IP: 103.29.142.67 X-LOGIN-NAME: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: <68e44678e8e48fcaaee91ba71d88908f> X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Message-ID: <5996A626.5040303@rock-chips.com> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:32:38 +0800 From: jeffy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20130126 Thunderbird/19.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn Lin CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, briannorris@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org, Heiko Stuebner , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Add support for pcie wake irq References: <20170817120431.12398-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <20170817120431.12398-2-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <5e3accf1-6f84-861f-f647-628322bb7841@rock-chips.com> In-Reply-To: <5e3accf1-6f84-861f-f647-628322bb7841@rock-chips.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 549 Lines: 18 Hi Shawn, On 08/18/2017 03:23 PM, Shawn Lin wrote: >> >> @@ -1524,6 +1532,9 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_remove(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev); >> + device_init_wakeup(dev, false); >> + > > Looks good overall but I think we need this on the > error handling path of rockchip_pcie_probe as well? hmm, right, will fix it, thanks. and i also notice some other missing error handling, will fix them too:)