Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751867AbdHRMiC (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:38:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58492 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750881AbdHRMiB (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:38:01 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 7DA0880469 Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: Avoid guest page table walk when gpa_available is set To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, wanpeng.li@hotmail.com, Brijesh Singh References: <1502987818-24065-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1502987818-24065-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <97f78603-3007-2418-653a-58a0d33a0523@redhat.com> <20170818123649.GB20100@flask> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <661ca6b5-bfb4-5377-d537-fb058d86ca0c@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:37:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170818123649.GB20100@flask> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 12:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 598 Lines: 19 On 18/08/2017 14:36, Radim Krčmář wrote: >>> + gpa = vcpu->arch.gpa_val; >>> + ret = vcpu_is_mmio_gpa(vcpu, addr, gpa, write); >>> + } else { >>> + ret = vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa(vcpu, addr, &gpa, exception, write); >>> } >>> >>> - ret = vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa(vcpu, addr, &gpa, exception, write); >>> - >>> if (ret < 0) >>> return X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT; >> just wondering if it makes sense to move this into the else branch (as >> it logically only belongs to vcpu_mmio_gva_to_gpa) > > It does, I took the liberty to change that. It was on purpose, but it's okay either way. :) Paolo