From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] sched/wait: Break up long wake list walk
Thread-Topic: [PATCH 1/2] sched/wait: Break up long wake list walk
Thread-Index: AQHTFWNBYSKZKyu5OE6Y+fM96SxNwqKEIDEAgASaOPD//398AIAAsKCA//+X4wCAAQZZgIAAplUA//+BiwAAFSW90A==
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:53:30 +0000
Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07753787AE4@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <84c7f26182b7f4723c0fe3b34ba912a9de92b8b7.1502758114.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
 <CA+55aFznC1wqBSfYr8=92LGqz5-F6fHMzdXoqM4aOYx8sT1Dhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07753786CE9@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <CA+55aFwzTMrZwh7TE_VeZt8gx5Syoop-kA=Xqs56=FkyakrM6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0775378761B@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <CA+55aFy_RNx5TQ8esjPPOKuW-o+fXbZgWapau2MHyexcAZtqsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170818122339.24grcbzyhnzmr4qw@techsingularity.net>
 <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077537879BB@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <20170818144622.oabozle26hasg5yo@techsingularity.net>
In-Reply-To: <20170818144622.oabozle26hasg5yo@techsingularity.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 10.0.102.7
dlp-reaction: no-action
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1127
Lines: 34


> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 02:20:38PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > > Nothing fancy other than needing a comment if it works.
> > >
> >
> > No, the patch doesn't work.
> >
> 
> That indicates that it may be a hot page and it's possible that the page is
> locked for a short time but waiters accumulate.  What happens if you leave
> NUMA balancing enabled but disable THP?  

No, disabling THP doesn't help the case.

Thanks,
Kan

> Waiting on migration entries also
> uses wait_on_page_locked so it would be interesting to know if the problem
> is specific to THP.
> 
> Can you tell me what this workload is doing? I want to see if it's something
> like many threads pounding on a limited number of pages very quickly. If it's
> many threads working on private data, it would also be important to know
> how each buffers threads are aligned, particularly if the buffers are smaller
> than a THP or base page size. For example, if each thread is operating on a
> base page sized buffer then disabling THP would side-step the problem but
> THP would be false sharing between multiple threads.
> 
> 
> --
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs