Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261994AbTGAKYW (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2003 06:24:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262008AbTGAKYW (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2003 06:24:22 -0400 Received: from smtp4.yaonline.es ([62.151.11.134]:1996 "EHLO smtp4.yaonline.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261994AbTGAKYV (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2003 06:24:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:32:41 +0200 From: Luis Miguel Garcia To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel@kolivas.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] O1int 0307010922 for 2.5.73 interactivity Message-Id: <20030701133241.58d17db0.ktech@wanadoo.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 955 Lines: 20 Con, I want to give you Lots of Thanks for the work you're doing with the O1int patches. Don't you think that we need an option in the kernel to select if we want a Server Kernel or a Desktop Kernel? With the first one, only throughput is important and in the second one, we can take in all the stuff to improve the interactivity (preempt, 01int, granularity) so we can give more agresive interactivity to the Desktop Kernel. Is this a sillyness? -- ============================================================= Luis Miguel Garcia Mancebo Ingenieria Tecnica en Informatica de Gestion Universidad de Deusto / University of Deusto Bilbao / Spain ============================================================= - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/