Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:56:12 +0200
From: Luis Miguel Garcia <ktech@wanadoo.es>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Johoho <johoho@hojo-net.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] O1int 0307010922 for 2.5.73 interactivity
Message-Id: <20030701125612.28ea5be0.ktech@wanadoo.es>
In-Reply-To: <20030701105157.GB689@gmx.de>
References: <20030701133241.58d17db0.ktech@wanadoo.es>
	<20030701105157.GB689@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1174
Lines: 21

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:51:57 +0200
Wiktor Wodecki <wodecki@gmx.de> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:32:41PM +0200, Luis Miguel Garcia wrote:
> > With the first one, only throughput is important and in the second one, we can take in all the stuff to improve the interactivity (preempt, 01int, granularity) so we can give more agresive interactivity to the Desktop Kernel.
> > 
> > Is this a sillyness?
> 
> placing this in /proc would be a better idea. The more I watch the whole
> interactivity debate I think that there is no golden way for server and desktop machines.

This is for what I have said that. Sometimes the people says. "This is good for Desktop, but drops the performance / throughput 20%". Perhaps some people prefer having a true multimedia desktop without skips in the music and video, and less throughput (like i prefer).

But let Con do it's best. I think he knows what is doing  ;)

Thanks Con and others!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/