Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751646AbdHUDGX (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Aug 2017 23:06:23 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:49278 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751120AbdHUDGV (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Aug 2017 23:06:21 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 20:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20170820.200619.821714603187353951.davem@davemloft.net> To: david.daney@cavium.com Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] MIPS,bpf: Improvements for MIPS eBPF JIT From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20170818234033.5990-1-david.daney@cavium.com> References: <20170818234033.5990-1-david.daney@cavium.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sun, 20 Aug 2017 20:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 535 Lines: 15 From: David Daney Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:40:30 -0700 > I suggest that the whole thing go via the BPF/net-next path as there > are dependencies on code that is not yet merged to Linus' tree. What kind of dependency? On networking or MIPS changes? If the dependency is on MIPS changes, then if I cannot apply this as it will break the net-next build on MIPS. You should merge this via the MIPS tree, where the dependencies are, in that case. Please clarify what is specifically happening here. Thanks.