Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752253AbdHUIYd (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2017 04:24:33 -0400 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:45968 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751069AbdHUIYc (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2017 04:24:32 -0400 Message-ID: <599A98B7.6070909@iogearbox.net> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:24:23 +0200 From: Daniel Borkmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller , david.daney@cavium.com CC: ast@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] MIPS,bpf: Improvements for MIPS eBPF JIT References: <20170818234033.5990-1-david.daney@cavium.com> <20170820.200619.821714603187353951.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20170820.200619.821714603187353951.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 591 Lines: 16 On 08/21/2017 05:06 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: David Daney > Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:40:30 -0700 > >> I suggest that the whole thing go via the BPF/net-next path as there >> are dependencies on code that is not yet merged to Linus' tree. > > What kind of dependency? On networking or MIPS changes? On networking, David implemented the JLT, JLE, JSLT and JSLE ops for the JIT in the patch set. Back then the MIPS JIT wasn't in net-next tree, thus this is basically just a follow-up, so that we have all covered with JIT support for net-next. Thanks, Daniel