Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263971AbTGAVor (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:44:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264029AbTGAVor (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:44:47 -0400 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:35714 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263971AbTGAVol (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:44:41 -0400 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:51:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Mel Gorman cc: Daniel Phillips , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: What to expect with the 2.6 VM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200306301943.04326.phillips@arcor.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 921 Lines: 23 On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Mel Gorman wrote: > I was hoping someone else would write it so I could read it but thats what > I said about the 2.4 VM :-) . Yep, once again, my contributions are mainly > documenting related, believe it or not, I actually do code a bit from time > to time I happen to take a look at one of your docs and it was pretty good indeed. You're underestimating the value of the documentation, that many developers do not love to do. A university professor of mine once told me that developers do not want to do documentation, not because they're lazy, but because they do not want to show that what they did, at the very end, is not that cool ;) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/