Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932766AbdHVMcq (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:32:46 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com ([209.85.218.48]:34623 "EHLO mail-oi0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932615AbdHVMco (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:32:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1503017616-3252-1-git-send-email-david.daney@cavium.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 14:32:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] genirq/gpio: Add driver for ThunderX and OCTEON-TX SoCs To: David Daney Cc: Thomas Gleixner , David Daney , Alexandre Courbot , Mark Rutland , Marc Zyngier , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 695 Lines: 18 On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:07 PM, David Daney wrote: > Thanks everybody for helping me work through the challenges of preparing > this patch set. Touching multiple subsystems under the stewardship of > multiple maintainers can be difficult, but I think this worked out well. I side with Thomas: thanks for working hard and doing the right thing here where many would have given up. It's exactly this deep integration of new drivers that make the kernel provide such great infrastructure and clean drivers. Now I feel I need to understand this think good enough to spot the second driver that needs to do this already during early review ... Yours, Linus Walleij