Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754194AbdHWVPm (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2017 17:15:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f182.google.com ([209.85.128.182]:36212 "EHLO mail-wr0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751728AbdHWVPl (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2017 17:15:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 23:15:37 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Christian Brauner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] devpts: use dynamic_dname() to generate proc name Message-ID: <20170823211536.hujpah4cgcvqktur@gmail.com> References: <20170816194805.hnof3aqiqykwki7p@gmail.com> <87h8wyi9li.fsf@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h8wyi9li.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2132 Lines: 43 On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:31:53AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Christian Brauner writes: > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Linus Torvalds > > wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Christian Brauner > >> wrote: > >>>> And Christian, if you can beat on this, that would be good. > >>> > >>> Yes, I can pound on this nicely with liblxc. We have patch > >>> ( https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/1728 ) up for review that > >>> allocates pty fds from private devpts mounts in different namespaces > >>> and sends those fds around between different namespaces. > >> > >> Good. Testing that this works with different pts filesystems in > >> different places is exactly the kind of thing I'd like to see. I only > >> tested with my single pts filesystem that is mounted at /dev/pts, and > >> making sure it works when there are multiple mounts and in different > >> places is exactly the kind of testing this should get. > > > > I'm compiling a kernel now and depending on how good the in-flight > > wifi is I try to test this right away and answer here if that helps. If the > > in-flight wifi sucks it might take me until tomorrow. > > Linus has merged the fix but have you been able to test and verify all > is well from your side? Hi Eric, Sorry for the late reply! So I've tested the patch and it does what I expect it to do, i.e. it places the correct path as the content of /proc//fd/. However, if I'm correct not in all cases. But I need to confirm this first and I didn't want to start pointless discussions before having something reliable. Thanks! The reason for the late reply is that I was investigating some other "weirdness" related to this patch which also - I believe - touches on the bind-mount escaping you mentioned in your previous mail. It relates to an idea I had in mind for a while now but never thought through sufficiently. I hope to find some time on the weekend to think about this more clearly. I had hoped to bundle this up with my testing but didn't get around to it. Christian