Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264478AbTGBUfu (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2003 16:35:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264486AbTGBUfu (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2003 16:35:50 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:22933 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264478AbTGBUft (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2003 16:35:49 -0400 Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.4 vs gcc 3.3 ? From: Alan Cox To: "Robert L. Harris" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030702141345.GD13653@rdlg.net> References: <20030702141345.GD13653@rdlg.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1057178845.20319.13.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 02 Jul 2003 21:47:25 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 706 Lines: 15 On Mer, 2003-07-02 at 15:13, Robert L. Harris wrote: > I'm trying to compile the 2.4.21-ac3 kernel for some work machines. > One of the users is insisting on gcc 3.3 to compile. Reading the > web page on www.kernel.org this is recomended against. > > Perchance is this old news, is the 3.3 compiled kernel going to kill > something or anything that should be related to users or any bosses? It should work, some drivers still don't build with it however - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/