Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753592AbdHXRbP (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:31:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:35307 "EHLO mail-pg0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751231AbdHXRbO (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:31:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 23:01:03 +0530 From: Himanshu Jha To: Joe Perches Cc: dledford@redhat.com, sean.hefty@intel.com, hal.rosenstock@gmail.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/core: replace memcpy with ether_addr_copy Message-ID: <20170824173103.GA13379@himanshu-Vostro-3559> References: <1503589307-10457-1-git-send-email-himanshujha199640@gmail.com> <1503590792.12569.2.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1503590792.12569.2.camel@perches.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1149 Lines: 34 On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:06:32AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 21:11 +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote: > > Use ether_addr_copy to copy an ethernet address of size ETH_ALEN > > instead of memcpy. > [] > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c > [] > > @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ int rdma_addr_find_l2_eth_by_grh(const union ib_gid *sgid, > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > > > - memcpy(dmac, dev_addr.dst_dev_addr, ETH_ALEN); > > + ether_addr_copy(dmac, dev_addr.dst_dev_addr); > > dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, dev_addr.bound_dev_if); > > if (!dev) > > return -ENODEV; > > @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ int rdma_addr_find_smac_by_sgid(union ib_gid *sgid, u8 *smac, u16 *vlan_id) > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > > > - memcpy(smac, dev_addr.src_dev_addr, ETH_ALEN); > > + ether_addr_copy(smac, dev_addr.src_dev_addr); > > return ret; > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_addr_find_smac_by_sgid); > > Both dmac and smac are function arguments. > What guarantees these to be > aligned properly? > Yes, you are correct! The arguments should be a pointer to a six byte Ethernet address. Apologies!