Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265504AbTGCXFy (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2003 19:05:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265518AbTGCXFy (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2003 19:05:54 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:44245 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265498AbTGCXFk (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2003 19:05:40 -0400 Message-ID: <3F04BA16.7050301@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 19:19:50 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Pryzby CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitor-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: "Will be removed in 2.4" References: <20030703200134.GA18459@andromeda> In-Reply-To: <20030703200134.GA18459@andromeda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 853 Lines: 26 Justin Pryzby wrote: > Linux 2.4.21, include/asm/io.h:51 says "Will be removed in 2.4". Its > there in 2.5.74 as well. > > I can understand why it would be in 2.5; the comment should say 2.6, > though. Actually there is a larger issue too: I would love it if someone (kernel janitors?) went through the kernel code and dug out all the comments like this. "should be gone by 1.3" :) "should be removed in 2.5". etc. This should be a pretty easy, but time consuming job that even newbies could sink their teeth into. Then we can go through the list and kill the issues, or the comments. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/