Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751415AbdH1VWK (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:22:10 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:37584 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751272AbdH1VWG (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:22:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 23:21:52 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Toshi Kani , mchehab@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_platform_list() Message-ID: <20170828212151.dawlnvvxhkkcmqo3@pd.tnic> References: <20170823225447.15608-1-toshi.kani@hpe.com> <20170823225447.15608-2-toshi.kani@hpe.com> <20170824075348.gqvobmk7mf5ppaip@pd.tnic> <1587060.BVEodWPrhf@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1587060.BVEodWPrhf@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 590 Lines: 19 On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:55:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > So what about the [3-5/5] in this series? > > My current plan is to apply them too and expose a branch with them, can I > go ahead with that? No, please expose a branch with only the ACPI patches, i.e., 1 and 2 and I can merge it and apply the EDAC patches ontop. Then you and I need to sync up so that you send your pull requests first and I follow you so that Linus applies them in the proper order. Makes sense? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.