Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751564AbdH2RMz (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:12:55 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:18225 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751409AbdH2RMA (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:12:00 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,445,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="1189433356" From: kan.liang@intel.com To: acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org, eranian@google.com, jolsa@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, ak@linux.intel.com, Kan Liang Subject: [PATCH V2 5/5] perf test: add test case for PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:11:12 -0400 Message-Id: <1504026672-7304-6-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.4.3 In-Reply-To: <1504026672-7304-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> References: <1504026672-7304-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1348 Lines: 43 From: Kan Liang Extend sample-parsing test cases to support new sample type PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang --- tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c index 6d028f4..c385848 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c @@ -141,6 +141,9 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1, } } + if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR) + COMP(phys_addr); + return true; } @@ -206,6 +209,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format) .mask = sample_regs, .regs = regs, }, + .phys_addr = 113, }; struct sample_read_value values[] = {{1, 5}, {9, 3}, {2, 7}, {6, 4},}; struct perf_sample sample_out; @@ -305,7 +309,7 @@ int test__sample_parsing(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u * were added. Please actually update the test rather than just change * the condition below. */ - if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR << 1) { + if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR << 1) { pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n"); return -1; } -- 2.4.3