DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org DC74860B7E
Subject: Re: Regression in next with gpiolib
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
References: <20170830214127.GJ6008@atomide.com>
From: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <5c672146-2a4c-6da5-85b1-5f2bb2ae5649@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:49:43 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170830214127.GJ6008@atomide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 660
Lines: 15

On 08/30/2017 04:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> It seems to be that we're now calling request and free on all gpios
> before they are properly configured?

Yes, that's what my patch does.  At the time, it seemed like a good idea 
-- request the GPIO before touching its hardware.  But it appears that 
the 'request' function of some drivers also re-muxes the GPIO in order 
to honor the request.

The question is whether that's correct behavior.  I don't know.

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.  Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.