Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751323AbdHaJVA (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 05:21:00 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:37080 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750880AbdHaJU5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 05:20:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170831014624.GA18554@lunn.ch> References: <20170830220631.GM22289@lunn.ch> <20170831014624.GA18554@lunn.ch> From: Maxim Uvarov Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:20:55 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DSA mv88e6xxx RX frame errors and TCP/IP RX failure To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Tim Harvey , netdev , Vivien Didelot , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Fugang Duan Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3812 Lines: 103 check with ping -s 1500 that packets passed to cpu. mv88e6xxx add additional dsa tag before the frame so small packets can pass and big rejected. also ethtool -S dsaethdevX shows more details stats for Marvell chips. or opposite, lower mtu on cpu to 1400 and check that ping works. So from description of patch above it has to work. Maxim. 2017-08-31 4:46 GMT+03:00 Andrew Lunn : >> > /* Report late collisions as a frame error. */ >> > if (status & (BD_ENET_RX_NO | BD_ENET_RX_CL)) >> > ndev->stats.rx_frame_errors++; >> > >> > I don't see anywhere else frame errors are counted, but it would be >> > good to prove we are looking in the right place. >> > >> >> Andrew, >> >> (adding IMX FEC driver maintainer to CC) >> >> Yes, that's one of them being hit. It looks like ifconfig reports >> 'frame' as the accumulation of a few stats so here are some more >> specifics from /sys/class/net/eth0/statistics: >> >> root@xenial:/sys/devices/soc0/soc/2100000.aips-bus/2188000.ethernet/net/eth0/statistics# >> for i in `ls rx_*`; do echo $i:$(cat $i); done >> rx_bytes:103229 >> rx_compressed:0 >> rx_crc_errors:22 >> rx_dropped:0 >> rx_errors:22 >> rx_fifo_errors:0 >> rx_frame_errors:22 >> rx_length_errors:22 >> rx_missed_errors:0 >> rx_nohandler:0 >> rx_over_errors:0 >> rx_packets:1174 >> root@xenial:/sys/devices/soc0/soc/2100000.aips-bus/2188000.ethernet/net/eth0/statistics# >> ifconfig eth0 >> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:D0:12:41:F3:E7 >> inet6 addr: fe80::2d0:12ff:fe41:f3e7/64 Scope:Link >> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> RX packets:1207 errors:22 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:66 >> TX packets:42 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 >> RX bytes:106009 (103.5 KiB) TX bytes:4604 (4.4 KiB) >> >> Instrumenting fec driver I see the following getting hit: >> >> status & BD_ENET_RX_LG /* rx_length_errors: Frame too long */ >> status & BD_ENET_RX_CR /* rx_crc_errors: CRC Error */ >> status & BD_ENET_RX_CL /* rx_frame_errors: Collision? */ >> >> Is this a frame size issue where the MV88E6176 is sending frames down >> that exceed the MTU because of headers added? > > I did fix an issue recently with that. See > > commit fbbeefdd21049fcf9437c809da3828b210577f36 > Author: Andrew Lunn > Date: Sun Jul 30 19:36:05 2017 +0200 > > net: fec: Allow reception of frames bigger than 1522 bytes > > The FEC Receive Control Register has a 14 bit field indicating the > longest frame that may be received. It is being set to 1522. Frames > longer than this are discarded, but counted as being in error. > > When using DSA, frames from the switch has an additional header, > either 4 or 8 bytes if a Marvell switch is used. Thus a full MTU frame > of 1522 bytes received by the switch on a port becomes 1530 bytes when > passed to the host via the FEC interface. > > Change the maximum receive size to 2048 - 64, where 64 is the maximum > rx_alignment applied on the receive buffer for AVB capable FEC > cores. Use this value also for the maximum receive buffer size. The > driver is already allocating a receive SKB of 2048 bytes, so this > change should not have any significant effects. > > Tested on imx51, imx6, vf610. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller > > > However, this is was of an all/nothing problem. All frames with the > full MTU were getting dropped, where as i think you are only seeing a > few dropped? > > Anyway, try cherry picking that patch and see if it helps. > > Andrew -- Best regards, Maxim Uvarov