Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751746AbdHaUQX (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:16:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41828 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751676AbdHaUQV (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:16:21 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com B6F65356C2 Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=riel@redhat.com Message-ID: <1504210576.12821.6.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/12] housekeeping: Move housekeeping related code to its own file From: Rik van Riel To: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Chris Metcalf , Thomas Gleixner , Luiz Capitulino , Christoph Lameter , "Paul E . McKenney" , Ingo Molnar , Mike Galbraith , Wanpeng Li Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:16:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1503453071-952-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> References: <1503453071-952-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1503453071-952-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qe8/0wIRzswMsLx9sGIm" Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 20:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1205 Lines: 37 --=-qe8/0wIRzswMsLx9sGIm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 03:51 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > The housekeeping code is currently tied to the nohz code. As we are > planning to make housekeeping independant from it, start with moving > the relevant code to its own file. >=20 Why are nohz full and housekeeping being decoupled from each other? Won't people want to use them together? What use case am I missing? --=20 All rights reversed --=-qe8/0wIRzswMsLx9sGIm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJZqG6QAAoJEM553pKExN6DH9cH/iQK+EEbVRSJf+r1xbaOXR5j PdgtFG8iPKTLQrDS+GMa2eK9ZBOryrS/Oky4wlhEcMS7Lz8nCGZbkfMvC98NqNKK F3kRsiDvfSjzpLIpBNjQFdxnUGAxxk+CdhUPvZrbsXzit2cDsGEw0I1VhNuZ1KBt TFqjE5y3qbiu6rtsZ94Umtpz/+BZEZpMlewk3uyclio1VDfTxjEIzq8OZ3pptWV2 XGZi9hLRW3xsTY3MHxxrkqKVffoVE/6xAfGsxcwD0/gG2mKKhzwOEdVe2nMiOgQ6 5gTvf3cBWkHDlnSs7/VHnefxs65tJ1jsBl0ddyBF1VzSx4T55iNLFhaVd39L4u8= =pUW9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qe8/0wIRzswMsLx9sGIm--