Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266639AbTGFHqb (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2003 03:46:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266635AbTGFHqZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2003 03:46:25 -0400 Received: from lindsey.linux-systeme.com ([80.190.48.67]:5381 "EHLO mx00.linux-systeme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266631AbTGFHqY (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2003 03:46:24 -0400 From: Marc-Christian Petersen Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel To: Chris Mason Subject: Re: Status of the IO scheduler fixes for 2.4 Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 09:58:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: lkml , Andrea Arcangeli , Nick Piggin References: <1057354654.20903.1280.camel@tiny.suse.com> In-Reply-To: <1057354654.20903.1280.camel@tiny.suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307060958.36642.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 731 Lines: 21 On Friday 04 July 2003 23:37, Chris Mason wrote: Hi Chris, > > If the IO fairness still doesnt > > get somewhat better for general use (well get isolated user reports and > > benchmarks for both the two patches), then I might consider the q->full > > patch (it has throughtput drawbacks and I prefer avoiding a tunable > > there). now there is io-stalls-10 in .22-pre3 (lowlat elev. + fixpausing). Could you please send "q->full patch" as ontop of -pre3? :-) Thank you. ciao, Marc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/