Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754121AbdIFDY1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2017 23:24:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:34554 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752340AbdIFDYZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2017 23:24:25 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7+8oSU5GXaH1NSSvuFq01Oqs6uvlbUyTeYBFk5erE9tKqmQFAeoEXoVlPwl23zihbcKnK5qQ== Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:24:21 -0700 From: Alexei Starovoitov To: Joel Fernandes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Juri Lelli , Alison Chaiken , Chenbo Feng , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/4] Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples Message-ID: <20170906032420.3bkvyz4p3wu2hyvy@ast-mbp> References: <20170903182326.30547-1-joelaf@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170903182326.30547-1-joelaf@google.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 545 Lines: 10 On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:23:21AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: > These patches fix issues seen when cross-compiling eBPF samples on arm64. > Compared to [1], I dropped the controversial inline-asm patch pending further > discussion on the right way to do it. However these patches are still a step in > the right direction and I wanted them to get in before the more controversial > bit. All patches in this set look good to me. When you repost without changes after net-next reopens pls keep my: Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov