Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266932AbTGGJbI (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2003 05:31:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266934AbTGGJbI (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2003 05:31:08 -0400 Received: from imhotep.hursley.ibm.com ([194.196.110.14]:16654 "EHLO tor.trudheim.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266932AbTGGJbF (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2003 05:31:05 -0400 Subject: rebased cpufreq patch? From: Anders Karlsson To: LKML Cc: Bill Nottingham Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TYuez6bE9D/cFR/rwBVw" Organization: Trudheim Technology Limited Message-Id: <1057571137.2584.5.camel@tor.trudheim.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Rubber Turnip www.usr-local-bin.org Date: 07 Jul 2003 10:45:37 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1076 Lines: 40 --=-TYuez6bE9D/cFR/rwBVw Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there, Is there any chance of getting the CPUFreq patch rebased against 2.4.22-pre3 ? I have been using the two patches linux-2.4.20-cpufreq.patch and cpufreq-centrino.patch against 2.4.21-rc7-ac1 since June 12th without any problems. From what I can tell, it is working very well indeed, so if it could be included in -pre4 it'd be great. Regards, /A --=-TYuez6bE9D/cFR/rwBVw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/CUFBLYywqksgYBoRAqhaAJ995bnPYFTQe+9K0w6K1+EvGilgQwCg1Su8 9wh+8z2af53dq3ZTGM9BVOA= =Uh1h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TYuez6bE9D/cFR/rwBVw-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/