Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 20:19:46 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: SME/32-bit regression
Message-ID: <20170906181946.savnnahph7wtr76b@pd.tnic>
References: <4c07148a-5d97-0fc2-aa9b-1db31429736d@oracle.com>
 <20170906092618.fkvzrqx32z6iqf2t@pd.tnic>
 <20170906094504.6pp4xdsmcxaympth@pd.tnic>
 <CY4PR12MB11415936E980489690575E65EC970@CY4PR12MB1141.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <20170906164417.2terp5ioelzglehq@pd.tnic>
 <56f022a2-e363-0524-68ba-c31950d96e0d@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56f022a2-e363-0524-68ba-c31950d96e0d@amd.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 915
Lines: 32

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:06:50PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> I did the following quick run with your patch and everything seems to be
> working okay
> 
> 64-bit build:
> -------
> 1) Baremetal SME *enabled* - System boots fine
>  a) 32-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>  b) 64-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>  c) 64-bit SEV guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
> 
> 2) Baremetal SME *disabled* - System boots fine
>  a) 32-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>  b) 64-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>  c) 64-bit SEV guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
> 
> 32-bit build
> ----------
> I am installing 32-bit distro to verify 32-bit baremetal boot and will
> report my findings soon.

Thanks Brijesh, that's awesome!

I'll add your Tested-by once you're done testing successfully.

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.